Dogmatism and Its Relation to the Formation of Ideological Identity of the University Students

Abstract

The formation of the identity of the ego associates with adolescence and the beginnings of youth, where represents the basic requirement for growth. This stage reflects a turning point towards the necessary autonomy for the growth of normal in adulthood that needs the ego growth from his point of view to pass eight consecutive stages of the individual faces in each particular crisis. It is determined by its growth path depending on the nature of solved positively or negatively, influenced by several factors: biological, social, cultural, personal, and a dogmatic obstacle to personal thinking which refers to the kind of sclerotic thought a bigot to the inside of obsolete beliefs refuse to discuss and consider. The final idea is debatable and the amendment for which it affects the personality of the individual and in his actions and dealings with those around him. Additionally, it is determined by the current research to identify the research variables dogmatic thinking and the identity of the ideological ego Mustansiriya University students of both

(male-female) for the academic year 2015-2016. the results showed that the research sample of Mustansiriya University students do not have dogmatic thinking and the lack of statistically significant differences between male and female students dogmatic thinking differences, as proven search results to the research sample of university students enjoy the identity of the ego ideological. In addition, there is no difference between male and female students in the identity of the ego ideology; there is no correlation between dogmatic thinking and the identity of the ideological ego university students.